ZUMZ

Zumiez Inc. Consumer Discretionary - Specialty Retail Investor Relations →

YES
9.7% BELOW
↓ Approaching Was -6.9% last week
-15% -10% -5% 0% 5% 10% 15%+
Buy Threshold $19.70
14-Week RSI 40
Rel. Volume (14w) This week's trading vs. the 14-week average 2.0x
Buyers vs. Sellers (14w) Are up-weeks or down-weeks getting more volume? 0.66 — Sellers winning

Zumiez Inc. (ZUMZ) closed at $17.79 as of 2026-06-19, trading 9.7% below its 200-week moving average of $19.70. This places ZUMZ in the deep value zone. The stock is currently moving closer to the line, down from -6.9% last week. The 14-week RSI sits at 40, indicating neutral momentum.

Over the past 14 weeks, down-weeks have had more trading volume than up-weeks (0.66 buyers-vs-sellers ratio). That means when people are active, they're more often selling than buying. Sellers are still more in control than buyers.

Over the past 1054 weeks of data, ZUMZ has crossed below its 200-week moving average 17 times. On average, these episodes lasted 32 weeks. Historically, investors who bought ZUMZ at the start of these episodes saw an average one-year return of +32.4%.

With a market cap of $300 million, ZUMZ is a small-cap stock. The company generates a free cash flow yield of 13.8%, which is notably high. Return on equity stands at 4.8%. The stock trades at 0.8x book value.

The company has been aggressively buying back shares, reducing its share count by 12.9% over the past three years. This stock also meets the Yartseva multibagger criteria as a small-cap with strong free cash flow yield and reasonable book value.

Over the past 20.2 years, a hypothetical investment of $100 in ZUMZ would have grown to $55, compared to $824 for the S&P 500. ZUMZ has returned -2.9% annualized vs 11.0% for the index, underperforming the broader market over this period.

Free cash flow has been volatile over the past several years, making the quality of earnings harder to assess.

Business Health

Annual financials — how the underlying business has performed over the past several years.

Cash Flow Free cash flow & net income ($M)

Revenue Annual revenue ($M) — business growth proxy

Total Debt Balance sheet debt ($M)

ROIC Return on invested capital (%)

FCF Yield Free cash flow / market cap (%) — Yartseva signal

Gross Margin Pricing power & competitive moat (%)

Shares Outstanding Buybacks vs dilution (millions)

Growth of $100: ZUMZ vs S&P 500

Monthly data normalized to $100 at start. Vertical dashed lines mark 200-week MA touches.

What Happens After ZUMZ Crosses Below the Line?

Across 16 historical episodes, buying ZUMZ when it crossed below its 200-week moving average produced an average return of +32.8% after 12 months (median +39.0%), compared to +11.6% for the S&P 500 over the same periods. 69% of those episodes were profitable after one year. After 24 months, the average return was +17.9% vs +26.3% for the index.

Each line shows $100 invested at the moment ZUMZ crossed below its 200-week MA. Bold blue = stock average. Gray dashed = S&P 500 average over same periods.

Bean Score Experimental

The Bean Score measures how far a stock's free cash flow yield has deviated from its own quarterly baseline, normalized by the stock's historical behavior. Between earnings dates, FCF is constant — so the score is purely a function of stock price. The levels below show at what prices ZUMZ would reach each dislocation threshold.

Current Bean Score +2.87σ
Current FCF Yield 12.58%
Baseline Yield 8.98%
Historical σ 1.06pp

Dislocation Price Levels

Prices where ZUMZ's Bean Score would hit each σ threshold. Valid until next earnings report: 2026-09-03.

LevelσPriceSignal
Deep Value+2σ$18.77Unusually cheap — potential buy zone
Value+1σ$20.66Cheap vs. own history
Fair Value+0σ$22.96Historical mean behavior
Expensive-1σ$25.84Expensive vs. own history
Deep Expensive-2σ$29.55Unusually expensive — potential trim zone

Quarterly FCF & Yield Trailing twelve-month free cash flow and yield at each quarter end

Data depth: 2 quarterly baselines, 18 price observations — Limited history (4+ quarters preferred for reliability)

Signal Accuracy Collecting Data

The Bean Score system is accumulating weekly data to validate signal accuracy. After 13+ weeks of history, this section will display win rates and average returns for each σ threshold crossing — answering the question: "When this score says cheap or expensive, does the price subsequently move in the expected direction?"

11 / 13 weeks minimum

Theoretical framework — not backtested or forward-tested. The Bean Score uses trailing twelve-month free cash flow yield as a dislocation identifier. It measures whether the market has pushed a stock's yield unusually far from its own baseline behavior. These levels are reference points for identifying potential swing trade opportunities, not buy/sell signals. FCF values update quarterly with earnings; between reports, all movement is price-driven.

Dislocation Scores Experimental

Each score measures deviation from ZUMZ's own historical baseline — the same idea as the Bean Score, applied to different fundamentals. Positive means cheaper or more dislocated than this stock's norm. Scores marked σ are normalized by the stock's own variability; pp values are simple deltas from its recent baseline.

2 stacked signals: buyback, value_vs_history
Yield Dislocation N/A Dividend yield vs own 10-yr norm
Drawdown Score +0.28σ Distance from line vs own history
Sector-Relative N/A Vs sector median this week
Buyback Acceleration -6.9pp YoY share change vs own 3-yr pace (− = accelerating)
Insider Intensity N/A TTM buys / market cap, percentile of buyers
FCF Yield vs History +12.5pp Vs own recent annual mean
Earnings Quality Stable Accrual gap trend (-2.3pp of revenue)

Theoretical framework — not backtested. These scores describe how unusual today's readings are for this specific company. They are starting points for research, not buy or sell signals. Annual-statement scores (buyback, accruals, FCF vs history) rest on only ~4 yearly data points and are deltas, not sigmas.

Advertisement

Historical Touches

ZUMZ has crossed below its 200-week MA 17 times with an average 1-year return of +32.4% after recovery.

Crossed BelowRecoveredWeeksMax Depth1-Year ReturnReturn Since Touch
Aug 2006Sep 2006311.0%+109.3%-19.8%
Nov 2007Sep 201015173.8%-67.0%-31.9%
Aug 2011Sep 201132.6%+107.7%+3.2%
Oct 2012Feb 20131415.3%+43.5%-13.5%
Dec 2013Dec 201325.6%+34.8%-30.4%
Jan 2014May 20141717.5%+72.6%-22.6%
Jul 2014Jul 201410.2%-0.5%-34.3%
Jun 2015Jan 201813650.1%-39.9%-25.9%
Jan 2018Mar 2018814.5%+6.8%-20.4%
Apr 2018Apr 201810.2%+18.9%-20.4%
Jul 2018Jul 201836.5%+20.7%-14.0%
Oct 2018Oct 201811.2%+53.0%-16.7%
Nov 2018Jan 2019913.6%+46.4%-15.6%
May 2019Jun 201910.7%+23.2%-10.1%
Mar 2020May 20201134.5%+137.5%-7.2%
May 2022Oct 202517955.2%-48.6%-43.8%
Jun 2026Ongoing3+12.2%Ongoing+2.3%
Average32+32.4%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is ZUMZ below its 200-week moving average?

Yes. As of 2026-06-19, Zumiez Inc. (ZUMZ) is trading 9.7% below its 200-week moving average of $19.70. The current price is $17.79.

What is ZUMZ's 200-week moving average price?

Zumiez Inc.'s 200-week moving average is $19.70 as of 2026-06-19. This is the average weekly closing price over roughly the last 4 years, and it acts as a long-term trend line. When a stock drops below this level, it can signal that the price has fallen far enough from the long-term trend to attract value-oriented investors.

What happens when ZUMZ drops below its 200-week moving average?

ZUMZ has crossed below its 200-week moving average 17 times in our data. On average, buying at that moment produced a one-year return of +32.4%. These dips have historically been decent entry points. These episodes lasted 32 weeks on average.

Is ZUMZ a good value right now?

Here's what our data says about ZUMZ as of 2026-06-19: The stock is below its 200-week moving average, which is the starting point for our analysis. The 14-week RSI is 40. Free cash flow yield is 13.8%. Return on equity is 4.8%. Price-to-book is 0.8x. This is not a buy or sell recommendation — always do your own research.

How does ZUMZ compare to the S&P 500?

Over the past 20.2 years, $100 invested in ZUMZ would have grown to $55, compared to $824 for the S&P 500. That's -2.9% annualized vs 11.0% for the index. ZUMZ has underperformed the broader market over this period.

Not financial advice. This is an educational tool. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Do your own research before making investment decisions.

Data as of week of 2026-06-19