LPL
LG Display Technology Investor Relations →
LG Display (LPL) closed at $3.31 as of 2026-09-11, trading 24.5% below its 200-week moving average of $4.38. This places LPL in the extreme value zone. The stock moved further from the line this week, up from -24.9% last week. With a 14-week RSI of 24, LPL is in oversold territory.
Trading volume is running at 0.8x of its 14-week average, which is in the normal range. The balance between buying and selling volume (0.83 ratio) is neutral — neither side is clearly dominating.
Over the past 1107 weeks of data, LPL has crossed below its 200-week moving average 25 times. On average, these episodes lasted 30 weeks. The average one-year return after crossing below was -17.1%, suggesting these dips have not historically been reliable buying opportunities for this stock.
With a market cap of $3.3 billion, LPL is a mid-cap stock. The company generates a free cash flow yield of 20295.7%, which is notably high. Return on equity stands at -17.6%. The stock trades at 0.7x book value.
Share count has increased 28.3% over three years, indicating dilution.
Over the past 21.3 years, a hypothetical investment of $100 in LPL would have grown to $14, compared to $943 for the S&P 500. LPL has returned -8.8% annualized vs 11.1% for the index, underperforming the broader market over this period.
Free cash flow has been volatile over the past several years, making the quality of earnings harder to assess.
Business Health
Annual financials — how the underlying business has performed over the past several years.
Cash Flow Free cash flow & net income ($M)
Revenue Annual revenue ($M) — business growth proxy
Total Debt Balance sheet debt ($M)
ROIC Return on invested capital (%)
FCF Yield Free cash flow / market cap (%) — Yartseva signal
Gross Margin Pricing power & competitive moat (%)
Shares Outstanding Buybacks vs dilution (millions)
Growth of $100: LPL vs S&P 500
Monthly data normalized to $100 at start. Vertical dashed lines mark 200-week MA touches.
What Happens After LPL Crosses Below the Line?
Across 25 historical episodes, buying LPL when it crossed below its 200-week moving average produced an average return of -16.0% after 12 months (median -13.0%), compared to +10.4% for the S&P 500 over the same periods. 27% of those episodes were profitable after one year. After 24 months, the average return was -18.5% vs +23.8% for the index.
Each line shows $100 invested at the moment LPL crossed below its 200-week MA. Bold blue = stock average. Gray dashed = S&P 500 average over same periods.
Dislocation Scores Experimental
Each score measures deviation from LPL's own historical baseline — the same idea as the Bean Score, applied to different fundamentals. Positive means cheaper or more dislocated than this stock's norm. Scores marked σ are normalized by the stock's own variability; pp values are simple deltas from its recent baseline.
Theoretical framework — not backtested. These scores describe how unusual today's readings are for this specific company. Each one is an analysis point, a reason to open the filings. Annual-statement scores (buyback, accruals, FCF vs history) rest on only ~4 yearly data points and are deltas, not sigmas.
Historical Touches
LPL has crossed below its 200-week MA 25 times with an average 1-year return of +-17.1% after recovery.
| Crossed Below | Recovered | Weeks | Max Depth | 1-Year Return | Return Since Touch |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2005 | Oct 2005 | 3 | 7.6% | -22.2% | -83.0% |
| May 2006 | Apr 2007 | 48 | 25.3% | +6.7% | -82.9% |
| Jun 2008 | Jan 2010 | 83 | 71.1% | -38.9% | -83.7% |
| Jan 2010 | Mar 2010 | 9 | 11.2% | +3.0% | -79.6% |
| Jun 2010 | Jun 2010 | 1 | 1.2% | -12.6% | -80.2% |
| Jun 2010 | Sep 2010 | 13 | 15.3% | -8.7% | -79.2% |
| Nov 2010 | Nov 2010 | 1 | 0.2% | -40.4% | -80.4% |
| Jan 2011 | Apr 2011 | 13 | 8.6% | -22.4% | -79.6% |
| May 2011 | Oct 2012 | 73 | 48.8% | -43.9% | -78.8% |
| Dec 2012 | Dec 2012 | 1 | 0.7% | -15.8% | -76.2% |
| Jan 2013 | Mar 2013 | 8 | 7.5% | -11.7% | -76.3% |
| Mar 2013 | Apr 2014 | 55 | 22.8% | -13.6% | -76.4% |
| Jun 2015 | Jul 2016 | 58 | 33.8% | -17.1% | -72.8% |
| Sep 2016 | Oct 2016 | 4 | 3.1% | +9.0% | -74.1% |
| Oct 2016 | Dec 2016 | 7 | 10.5% | +5.8% | -73.7% |
| Feb 2017 | Mar 2017 | 5 | 3.7% | +16.9% | -73.3% |
| Oct 2017 | Oct 2017 | 1 | 1.4% | -38.0% | -74.0% |
| Mar 2018 | Jan 2021 | 147 | 61.8% | -30.1% | -74.7% |
| Aug 2021 | Aug 2021 | 1 | 0.9% | -26.0% | -60.7% |
| Sep 2021 | Oct 2021 | 6 | 9.2% | -36.5% | -59.9% |
| Feb 2022 | Mar 2022 | 2 | 4.6% | -20.6% | -55.8% |
| Apr 2022 | Sep 2025 | 181 | 52.3% | -18.5% | -55.9% |
| Oct 2025 | Feb 2026 | 17 | 15.1% | N/A | -33.1% |
| Mar 2026 | May 2026 | 10 | 15.3% | N/A | -15.3% |
| Jun 2026 | Ongoing | 12+ | 32.3% | Ongoing | -13.8% |
| Average | 30 | — | +-17.1% | — |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is LPL below its 200-week moving average?
Yes. As of 2026-09-11, LG Display (LPL) is trading 24.5% below its 200-week moving average of $4.38. The current price is $3.31.
What is LPL's 200-week moving average price?
LG Display's 200-week moving average is $4.38 as of 2026-09-11. This is the average weekly closing price over roughly the last 4 years, and it acts as a long-term trend line. When a stock drops below this level, it can signal that the price has fallen far enough from the long-term trend to attract value-oriented investors.
What happens when LPL drops below its 200-week moving average?
LPL has crossed below its 200-week moving average 25 times in our data. The average one-year return after these crossings was -17.1%, meaning the dips were not reliable buying signals for this particular stock. These episodes lasted 30 weeks on average.
Is LPL a good value right now?
Here's what our data says about LPL as of 2026-09-11: The stock is below its 200-week moving average, which is the starting point for our analysis. The 14-week RSI is 24 (oversold). Free cash flow yield is 20295.7%. Return on equity is -17.6%. Price-to-book is 0.7x. This is not a buy or sell recommendation — always do your own research.
How does LPL compare to the S&P 500?
Over the past 21.3 years, $100 invested in LPL would have grown to $14, compared to $943 for the S&P 500. That's -8.8% annualized vs 11.1% for the index. LPL has underperformed the broader market over this period.
Not financial advice. This is an educational tool. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Do your own research before making investment decisions.
Data as of week of 2026-09-11