LAZ

Lazard, Inc. Financial Services - Capital Markets Investor Relations →

NO
13.3% ABOVE
↑ Moving away Was 12.0% last week
-15% -10% -5% 0% 5% 10% 15%+
Buy Threshold $39.09
14-Week RSI 57
Rel. Volume (14w) This week's trading vs. the 14-week average 3.5x — Surging
Buyers vs. Sellers (14w) Are up-weeks or down-weeks getting more volume? 1.43

Lazard, Inc. (LAZ) closed at $44.30 as of 2026-06-19, trading 13.3% above its 200-week moving average of $39.09. The stock moved further from the line this week, up from 12.0% last week. The 14-week RSI sits at 57, indicating neutral momentum.

A big jump in activity this week — 3.5x the usual volume, and the price went up. Significantly more people than usual decided to buy. This kind of surge, especially on a stock already below its 200-week average, can be an early sign that sentiment is shifting.

Over the past 1054 weeks of data, LAZ has crossed below its 200-week moving average 21 times. On average, these episodes lasted 19 weeks. Historically, investors who bought LAZ at the start of these episodes saw an average one-year return of +7.6%.

With a market cap of $4.4 billion, LAZ is a mid-cap stock. Return on equity stands at 34.3%, indicating strong profitability. The stock trades at 5.0x book value.

Share count has increased 9.3% over three years, indicating dilution.

Over the past 20.2 years, a hypothetical investment of $100 in LAZ would have grown to $221, compared to $824 for the S&P 500. LAZ has returned 4.0% annualized vs 11.0% for the index, underperforming the broader market over this period.

Free cash flow has been declining at a -14.7% compound annual rate. A deteriorating cash flow trend warrants extra scrutiny — the stock may be cheap for a reason.

Business Health

Annual financials — how the underlying business has performed over the past several years.

Cash Flow Free cash flow & net income ($M)

Revenue Annual revenue ($M) — business growth proxy

Total Debt Balance sheet debt ($M)

ROIC Return on invested capital (%)

FCF Yield Free cash flow / market cap (%) — Yartseva signal

Gross Margin Pricing power & competitive moat (%)

Shares Outstanding Buybacks vs dilution (millions)

Growth of $100: LAZ vs S&P 500

Monthly data normalized to $100 at start. Vertical dashed lines mark 200-week MA touches.

What Happens After LAZ Crosses Below the Line?

Across 21 historical episodes, buying LAZ when it crossed below its 200-week moving average produced an average return of +9.0% after 12 months (median +7.0%), compared to +10.2% for the S&P 500 over the same periods. 67% of those episodes were profitable after one year. After 24 months, the average return was +10.2% vs +22.8% for the index.

Each line shows $100 invested at the moment LAZ crossed below its 200-week MA. Bold blue = stock average. Gray dashed = S&P 500 average over same periods.

Bean Score Experimental

The Bean Score measures how far a stock's free cash flow yield has deviated from its own quarterly baseline, normalized by the stock's historical behavior. Between earnings dates, FCF is constant — so the score is purely a function of stock price. The levels below show at what prices LAZ would reach each dislocation threshold.

Current Bean Score -0.75σ
Current FCF Yield 10.90%
Baseline Yield 12.31%
Historical σ 1.43pp

Dislocation Price Levels

Prices where LAZ's Bean Score would hit each σ threshold. Valid until next earnings report: 2026-07-23.

LevelσPriceSignal
Deep Value+2σ$34.09Unusually cheap — potential buy zone
Value+1σ$37.72Cheap vs. own history
Fair Value+0σ$42.21Historical mean behavior
Expensive-1σ$47.92Expensive vs. own history
Deep Expensive-2σ$55.41Unusually expensive — potential trim zone

Quarterly FCF & Yield Trailing twelve-month free cash flow and yield at each quarter end

Data depth: 2 quarterly baselines, 22 price observations — Limited history (4+ quarters preferred for reliability)

Signal Accuracy Collecting Data

The Bean Score system is accumulating weekly data to validate signal accuracy. After 13+ weeks of history, this section will display win rates and average returns for each σ threshold crossing — answering the question: "When this score says cheap or expensive, does the price subsequently move in the expected direction?"

11 / 13 weeks minimum

Theoretical framework — not backtested or forward-tested. The Bean Score uses trailing twelve-month free cash flow yield as a dislocation identifier. It measures whether the market has pushed a stock's yield unusually far from its own baseline behavior. These levels are reference points for identifying potential swing trade opportunities, not buy/sell signals. FCF values update quarterly with earnings; between reports, all movement is price-driven.

Dislocation Scores Experimental

Each score measures deviation from LAZ's own historical baseline — the same idea as the Bean Score, applied to different fundamentals. Positive means cheaper or more dislocated than this stock's norm. Scores marked σ are normalized by the stock's own variability; pp values are simple deltas from its recent baseline.

⚠ Earnings quality deteriorating — net income is outrunning free cash flow vs this company's own norm. Cheapness signals here deserve extra scrutiny.
Yield Dislocation -1.14σ Dividend yield vs own 10-yr norm
Drawdown Score -0.11σ Distance from line vs own history
Sector-Relative +0.35σ Vs sector median this week
Buyback Acceleration +1.0pp YoY share change vs own 3-yr pace (− = accelerating)
Insider Intensity N/A TTM buys / market cap, percentile of buyers
FCF Yield vs History N/A Vs own recent annual mean
Earnings Quality Deteriorating Accrual gap trend (+4.3pp of revenue)

Theoretical framework — not backtested. These scores describe how unusual today's readings are for this specific company. They are starting points for research, not buy or sell signals. Annual-statement scores (buyback, accruals, FCF vs history) rest on only ~4 yearly data points and are deltas, not sigmas.

Advertisement

Historical Touches

LAZ has crossed below its 200-week MA 21 times with an average 1-year return of +7.6% after recovery.

Crossed BelowRecoveredWeeksMax Depth1-Year ReturnReturn Since Touch
Jul 2007Jul 200713.6%+5.3%+161.9%
Aug 2007Aug 200710.5%+12.1%+153.6%
Dec 2007Jul 20082918.2%-21.1%+153.7%
Sep 2008Sep 200821.4%+1.9%+152.9%
Oct 2008Aug 20094342.5%+15.7%+161.2%
Sep 2009Sep 200922.8%-1.6%+155.9%
Oct 2009Nov 200921.5%-0.9%+150.5%
Nov 2009Jan 201064.6%-4.4%+147.3%
Feb 2010Apr 201096.0%+22.5%+153.1%
May 2010Oct 20102529.5%+17.1%+171.7%
Nov 2010Nov 201011.3%-36.1%+158.6%
Jul 2011Dec 20127738.3%-23.9%+173.6%
Jan 2016Mar 2016920.2%+18.4%+112.4%
Apr 2016Nov 20163222.4%+40.1%+118.6%
Oct 2018Nov 20195418.8%+5.0%+72.9%
Feb 2020Nov 20203740.6%+14.4%+68.6%
Feb 2022Jul 20222211.6%+10.6%+52.1%
Sep 2022Oct 202258.2%-0.3%+59.1%
Mar 2023Jul 20231816.8%+22.7%+51.1%
Jul 2023Dec 20231918.7%+39.8%+51.6%
Mar 2025Apr 202534.8%+22.7%+32.4%
Average19+7.6%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is LAZ below its 200-week moving average?

No. Lazard, Inc. (LAZ) is currently 13.3% above its 200-week moving average of $39.09. It would need to fall to $39.09 to cross below the line.

What is LAZ's 200-week moving average price?

Lazard, Inc.'s 200-week moving average is $39.09 as of 2026-06-19. This is the average weekly closing price over roughly the last 4 years, and it acts as a long-term trend line. When a stock drops below this level, it can signal that the price has fallen far enough from the long-term trend to attract value-oriented investors.

What happens when LAZ drops below its 200-week moving average?

LAZ has crossed below its 200-week moving average 21 times in our data. On average, buying at that moment produced a one-year return of +7.6%. These dips have historically been decent entry points. These episodes lasted 19 weeks on average.

Is LAZ a good value right now?

Here's what our data says about LAZ as of 2026-06-19: The stock is above its 200-week moving average, so it doesn't currently meet our primary signal. The 14-week RSI is 57. Return on equity is 34.3%. Price-to-book is 5.0x. This is not a buy or sell recommendation — always do your own research.

How does LAZ compare to the S&P 500?

Over the past 20.2 years, $100 invested in LAZ would have grown to $221, compared to $824 for the S&P 500. That's 4.0% annualized vs 11.0% for the index. LAZ has underperformed the broader market over this period.

Not financial advice. This is an educational tool. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Do your own research before making investment decisions.

Data as of week of 2026-06-19