EG
Everest Group, Ltd. Financial Services - Insurance - Reinsurance Investor Relations →
Everest Group, Ltd. (EG) closed at $335.63 as of 2026-06-19, trading 1.5% below its 200-week moving average of $340.78. This places EG in the below line zone. The stock is currently moving closer to the line, down from -0.9% last week. The 14-week RSI sits at 59, indicating neutral momentum.
Trading volume is running at 1.5x of its 14-week average, which is in the normal range. The balance between buying and selling volume (0.96 ratio) is neutral — neither side is clearly dominating.
Over the past 1554 weeks of data, EG has crossed below its 200-week moving average 18 times. On average, these episodes lasted 14 weeks. Historically, investors who bought EG at the start of these episodes saw an average one-year return of +22.2%.
With a market cap of $13.3 billion, EG is a large-cap stock. The company generates a free cash flow yield of 30.1%, which is notably high. Return on equity stands at 13.8%. The stock trades at 0.9x book value.
Share count has increased 4.1% over three years, indicating dilution.
Over the past 29.8 years, a hypothetical investment of $100 in EG would have grown to $2099, compared to $1824 for the S&P 500. That represents an annualized return of 10.7% vs 10.2% for the index — confirming EG as a market-beating investment and the kind of quality company where buying during 200-week moving average touches has historically been rewarded.
In the past 12 months, corporate insiders have made 2 open-market purchases totaling $4,448,369. Notably, these purchases occurred while EG is trading below its 200-week moving average — insiders are buying when the market is most pessimistic.
Free cash flow has been volatile over the past several years, making the quality of earnings harder to assess.
Business Health
Annual financials — how the underlying business has performed over the past several years.
Cash Flow Free cash flow & net income ($M)
Revenue Annual revenue ($M) — business growth proxy
Total Debt Balance sheet debt ($M)
ROIC Return on invested capital (%)
FCF Yield Free cash flow / market cap (%) — Yartseva signal
Gross Margin Pricing power & competitive moat (%)
Shares Outstanding Buybacks vs dilution (millions)
Growth of $100: EG vs S&P 500
Monthly data normalized to $100 at start. Vertical dashed lines mark 200-week MA touches.
What Happens After EG Crosses Below the Line?
Across 17 historical episodes, buying EG when it crossed below its 200-week moving average produced an average return of +23.1% after 12 months (median +23.0%), compared to +11.5% for the S&P 500 over the same periods. 67% of those episodes were profitable after one year. After 24 months, the average return was +64.3% vs +13.7% for the index.
Each line shows $100 invested at the moment EG crossed below its 200-week MA. Bold blue = stock average. Gray dashed = S&P 500 average over same periods.
Bean Score Experimental
The Bean Score measures how far a stock's free cash flow yield has deviated from its own quarterly baseline, normalized by the stock's historical behavior. Between earnings dates, FCF is constant — so the score is purely a function of stock price. The levels below show at what prices EG would reach each dislocation threshold.
Dislocation Price Levels
Prices where EG's Bean Score would hit each σ threshold. Valid until next earnings report: 2026-07-29.
| Level | σ | Price | Signal |
|---|---|---|---|
| Deep Value | +2σ | $303.32 | Unusually cheap — potential buy zone |
| Value | +1σ | $315.92 | Cheap vs. own history |
| Fair Value | +0σ | $329.60 | Historical mean behavior |
| Expensive | -1σ | $344.53 | Expensive vs. own history |
| Deep Expensive | -2σ | $360.87 | Unusually expensive — potential trim zone |
Quarterly FCF & Yield Trailing twelve-month free cash flow and yield at each quarter end
Signal Accuracy Collecting Data
The Bean Score system is accumulating weekly data to validate signal accuracy. After 13+ weeks of history, this section will display win rates and average returns for each σ threshold crossing — answering the question: "When this score says cheap or expensive, does the price subsequently move in the expected direction?"
Theoretical framework — not backtested or forward-tested. The Bean Score uses trailing twelve-month free cash flow yield as a dislocation identifier. It measures whether the market has pushed a stock's yield unusually far from its own baseline behavior. These levels are reference points for identifying potential swing trade opportunities, not buy/sell signals. FCF values update quarterly with earnings; between reports, all movement is price-driven.
Dislocation Scores Experimental
Each score measures deviation from EG's own historical baseline — the same idea as the Bean Score, applied to different fundamentals. Positive means cheaper or more dislocated than this stock's norm. Scores marked σ are normalized by the stock's own variability; pp values are simple deltas from its recent baseline.
Theoretical framework — not backtested. These scores describe how unusual today's readings are for this specific company. They are starting points for research, not buy or sell signals. Annual-statement scores (buyback, accruals, FCF vs history) rest on only ~4 yearly data points and are deltas, not sigmas.
Historical Touches
EG has crossed below its 200-week MA 18 times with an average 1-year return of +22.2% after recovery.
| Crossed Below | Recovered | Weeks | Max Depth | 1-Year Return | Return Since Touch |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1998 | Oct 1998 | 1 | 1.4% | -24.2% | +1643.0% |
| Feb 1999 | Feb 1999 | 1 | 1.8% | -26.8% | +1626.5% |
| Mar 1999 | May 1999 | 7 | 5.5% | -3.6% | +1634.0% |
| Jun 1999 | Jun 1999 | 1 | 0.1% | +2.9% | +1592.7% |
| Jul 1999 | May 2000 | 42 | 32.1% | +27.1% | +1596.1% |
| Jun 2000 | Jun 2000 | 1 | 0.9% | +122.5% | +1545.1% |
| Jul 2002 | Jul 2002 | 1 | 5.0% | +71.7% | +1068.2% |
| Feb 2003 | Feb 2003 | 1 | 3.3% | +84.4% | +976.0% |
| Mar 2008 | Mar 2008 | 3 | 3.1% | -25.3% | +452.4% |
| Apr 2008 | Sep 2009 | 75 | 33.8% | -20.0% | +440.8% |
| Nov 2009 | Sep 2010 | 42 | 16.8% | +2.2% | +462.3% |
| Aug 2011 | Sep 2011 | 8 | 1.9% | +34.1% | +486.6% |
| Mar 2020 | Aug 2020 | 21 | 26.0% | +22.0% | +80.5% |
| Aug 2020 | Nov 2020 | 12 | 11.7% | +30.5% | +77.4% |
| Jan 2021 | Feb 2021 | 2 | 5.3% | +36.2% | +77.2% |
| Oct 2025 | Feb 2026 | 15 | 7.5% | N/A | +8.0% |
| Feb 2026 | Apr 2026 | 7 | 6.3% | N/A | +1.3% |
| May 2026 | Ongoing | 4+ | 5.1% | Ongoing | +4.2% |
| Average | 14 | — | +22.2% | — |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is EG below its 200-week moving average?
Yes. As of 2026-06-19, Everest Group, Ltd. (EG) is trading 1.5% below its 200-week moving average of $340.78. The current price is $335.63.
What is EG's 200-week moving average price?
Everest Group, Ltd.'s 200-week moving average is $340.78 as of 2026-06-19. This is the average weekly closing price over roughly the last 4 years, and it acts as a long-term trend line. When a stock drops below this level, it can signal that the price has fallen far enough from the long-term trend to attract value-oriented investors.
What happens when EG drops below its 200-week moving average?
EG has crossed below its 200-week moving average 18 times in our data. On average, buying at that moment produced a one-year return of +22.2%. These dips have historically been decent entry points. These episodes lasted 14 weeks on average.
Is EG a good value right now?
Here's what our data says about EG as of 2026-06-19: The stock is below its 200-week moving average, which is the starting point for our analysis. The 14-week RSI is 59. Free cash flow yield is 30.1%. Return on equity is 13.8%. Price-to-book is 0.9x. This is not a buy or sell recommendation — always do your own research.
How does EG compare to the S&P 500?
Over the past 29.8 years, $100 invested in EG would have grown to $2099, compared to $1824 for the S&P 500. That's 10.7% annualized vs 10.2% for the index. EG has outperformed the broader market over this period.
Does EG pay a dividend?
Yes. Everest Group, Ltd. currently pays a dividend yield of 237.00%.
Not financial advice. This is an educational tool. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Do your own research before making investment decisions.
Data as of week of 2026-06-19