CXW

CoreCivic, Inc. Industrials - Security & Protection Services Investor Relations →

NO
85.8% ABOVE
↑ Moving away Was 75.3% last week
-15% -10% -5% 0% 5% 10% 15%+
Buy Threshold $15.56
14-Week RSI 90
Rel. Volume (14w) This week's trading vs. the 14-week average 1.7x
Buyers vs. Sellers (14w) Are up-weeks or down-weeks getting more volume? 0.91

CoreCivic, Inc. (CXW) closed at $28.90 as of 2026-06-19, trading 85.8% above its 200-week moving average of $15.56. The stock moved further from the line this week, up from 75.3% last week. With a 14-week RSI of 90, CXW is in overbought territory.

Trading volume is running at 1.7x of its 14-week average, which is in the normal range. The balance between buying and selling volume (0.91 ratio) is neutral — neither side is clearly dominating.

Over the past 1461 weeks of data, CXW has crossed below its 200-week moving average 19 times. On average, these episodes lasted 36 weeks. Historically, investors who bought CXW at the start of these episodes saw an average one-year return of +4.7%.

With a market cap of $2.9 billion, CXW is a mid-cap stock. Free cash flow yield is currently negative, meaning the company is burning cash. Return on equity stands at 9.0%. The stock trades at 2.0x book value.

The company has been aggressively buying back shares, reducing its share count by 13.0% over the past three years.

Over the past 28.1 years, a hypothetical investment of $100 in CXW would have grown to $213, compared to $1074 for the S&P 500. CXW has returned 2.7% annualized vs 8.8% for the index, underperforming the broader market over this period.

Free cash flow has been volatile over the past several years, making the quality of earnings harder to assess.

Business Health

Annual financials — how the underlying business has performed over the past several years.

Cash Flow Free cash flow & net income ($M)

Revenue Annual revenue ($M) — business growth proxy

Total Debt Balance sheet debt ($M)

ROIC Return on invested capital (%)

FCF Yield Free cash flow / market cap (%) — Yartseva signal

Gross Margin Pricing power & competitive moat (%)

Shares Outstanding Buybacks vs dilution (millions)

Growth of $100: CXW vs S&P 500

Monthly data normalized to $100 at start. Vertical dashed lines mark 200-week MA touches.

What Happens After CXW Crosses Below the Line?

Across 19 historical episodes, buying CXW when it crossed below its 200-week moving average produced an average return of +9.8% after 12 months (median +15.0%), compared to +13.2% for the S&P 500 over the same periods. 68% of those episodes were profitable after one year. After 24 months, the average return was +32.0% vs +34.5% for the index.

Each line shows $100 invested at the moment CXW crossed below its 200-week MA. Bold blue = stock average. Gray dashed = S&P 500 average over same periods.

Bean Score Experimental

The Bean Score measures how far a stock's free cash flow yield has deviated from its own quarterly baseline, normalized by the stock's historical behavior. Between earnings dates, FCF is constant — so the score is purely a function of stock price. The levels below show at what prices CXW would reach each dislocation threshold.

Current Bean Score -1.11σ
Current FCF Yield 1.14%
Baseline Yield 1.29%
Historical σ 0.14pp

Dislocation Price Levels

Prices where CXW's Bean Score would hit each σ threshold. Valid until next earnings report: 2026-08-05.

LevelσPriceSignal
Deep Value+2σ$16.95Unusually cheap — potential buy zone
Value+1σ$18.56Cheap vs. own history
Fair Value+0σ$20.51Historical mean behavior
Expensive-1σ$22.92Expensive vs. own history
Deep Expensive-2σ$25.98Unusually expensive — potential trim zone

Quarterly FCF & Yield Trailing twelve-month free cash flow and yield at each quarter end

Data depth: 2 quarterly baselines, 22 price observations — Limited history (4+ quarters preferred for reliability)

Signal Accuracy Collecting Data

The Bean Score system is accumulating weekly data to validate signal accuracy. After 13+ weeks of history, this section will display win rates and average returns for each σ threshold crossing — answering the question: "When this score says cheap or expensive, does the price subsequently move in the expected direction?"

11 / 13 weeks minimum

Theoretical framework — not backtested or forward-tested. The Bean Score uses trailing twelve-month free cash flow yield as a dislocation identifier. It measures whether the market has pushed a stock's yield unusually far from its own baseline behavior. These levels are reference points for identifying potential swing trade opportunities, not buy/sell signals. FCF values update quarterly with earnings; between reports, all movement is price-driven.

Dislocation Scores Experimental

Each score measures deviation from CXW's own historical baseline — the same idea as the Bean Score, applied to different fundamentals. Positive means cheaper or more dislocated than this stock's norm. Scores marked σ are normalized by the stock's own variability; pp values are simple deltas from its recent baseline.

⚠ Earnings quality deteriorating — net income is outrunning free cash flow vs this company's own norm. Cheapness signals here deserve extra scrutiny.
Yield Dislocation -0.33σ Dividend yield vs own 10-yr norm
Drawdown Score -1.65σ Distance from line vs own history
Sector-Relative -1.67σ Vs sector median this week
Buyback Acceleration -4.4pp YoY share change vs own 3-yr pace (− = accelerating)
Insider Intensity N/A TTM buys / market cap, percentile of buyers
FCF Yield vs History -7.9pp Vs own recent annual mean
Earnings Quality Deteriorating Accrual gap trend (+5.8pp of revenue)

Theoretical framework — not backtested. These scores describe how unusual today's readings are for this specific company. They are starting points for research, not buy or sell signals. Annual-statement scores (buyback, accruals, FCF vs history) rest on only ~4 yearly data points and are deltas, not sigmas.

Advertisement

Historical Touches

CXW has crossed below its 200-week MA 19 times with an average 1-year return of +4.7% after recovery.

Crossed BelowRecoveredWeeksMax Depth1-Year ReturnReturn Since Touch
Jun 1998Mar 200324694.8%-61.9%+114.3%
Oct 2008Sep 20094853.9%+29.5%+227.9%
Sep 2009Sep 200913.3%+8.8%+188.2%
Jan 2010Aug 20103221.0%+22.8%+199.8%
Sep 2010Sep 201010.6%+4.8%+167.7%
Mar 2011Mar 201110.3%+15.4%+167.8%
May 2011Jun 201146.8%+15.1%+178.0%
Jul 2011Aug 2011712.0%+37.2%+177.4%
Nov 2011Jan 201276.1%+54.2%+184.3%
Oct 2015Jan 20161314.2%-49.4%+49.0%
Feb 2016Feb 201615.2%+23.1%+52.6%
Aug 2016Jan 20172452.7%+3.2%+40.7%
Aug 2017Jul 20184824.6%+5.2%+42.7%
Sep 2018May 20193223.6%-20.6%+41.4%
Jun 2019Apr 202214665.3%-51.5%+55.4%
Apr 2022Nov 20222925.9%-29.3%+132.5%
Dec 2022Dec 202211.7%+26.0%+153.5%
Jan 2023Aug 20233120.6%+20.4%+151.5%
Aug 2023Sep 202330.9%+36.0%+184.4%
Average36+4.7%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is CXW below its 200-week moving average?

No. CoreCivic, Inc. (CXW) is currently 85.8% above its 200-week moving average of $15.56. It would need to fall to $15.56 to cross below the line.

What is CXW's 200-week moving average price?

CoreCivic, Inc.'s 200-week moving average is $15.56 as of 2026-06-19. This is the average weekly closing price over roughly the last 4 years, and it acts as a long-term trend line. When a stock drops below this level, it can signal that the price has fallen far enough from the long-term trend to attract value-oriented investors.

What happens when CXW drops below its 200-week moving average?

CXW has crossed below its 200-week moving average 19 times in our data. On average, buying at that moment produced a one-year return of +4.7%. These dips have historically been decent entry points. These episodes lasted 36 weeks on average.

Is CXW a good value right now?

Here's what our data says about CXW as of 2026-06-19: The stock is above its 200-week moving average, so it doesn't currently meet our primary signal. The 14-week RSI is 90 (overbought). Free cash flow is currently negative. Return on equity is 9.0%. Price-to-book is 2.0x. This is not a buy or sell recommendation — always do your own research.

How does CXW compare to the S&P 500?

Over the past 28.1 years, $100 invested in CXW would have grown to $213, compared to $1074 for the S&P 500. That's 2.7% annualized vs 8.8% for the index. CXW has underperformed the broader market over this period.

Not financial advice. This is an educational tool. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Do your own research before making investment decisions.

Data as of week of 2026-06-19