CNP

CenterPoint Energy Inc. Utilities - Multi-Utilities Investor Relations →

NO
36.7% ABOVE
↓ Approaching Was 37.2% last week
-15% -10% -5% 0% 5% 10% 15%+
Buy Threshold $31.33
14-Week RSI 45
Rel. Volume (14w) This week's trading vs. the 14-week average 1.1x
Buyers vs. Sellers (14w) Are up-weeks or down-weeks getting more volume? 0.89

CenterPoint Energy Inc. (CNP) closed at $42.82 as of 2026-06-19, trading 36.7% above its 200-week moving average of $31.33. The stock is currently moving closer to the line, down from 37.2% last week. The 14-week RSI sits at 45, indicating neutral momentum.

Trading volume is running at 1.1x of its 14-week average, which is in the normal range. The balance between buying and selling volume (0.89 ratio) is neutral — neither side is clearly dominating.

Over the past 3315 weeks of data, CNP has crossed below its 200-week moving average 26 times. On average, these episodes lasted 28 weeks. Historically, investors who bought CNP at the start of these episodes saw an average one-year return of +6.3%.

With a market cap of $28.0 billion, CNP is a large-cap stock. Free cash flow yield is currently negative, meaning the company is burning cash. Return on equity stands at 9.6%. The stock trades at 2.5x book value.

Share count has increased 3.7% over three years, indicating dilution.

Over the past 33.5 years, a hypothetical investment of $100 in CNP would have grown to $1230, compared to $3097 for the S&P 500. CNP has returned 7.8% annualized vs 10.8% for the index, underperforming the broader market over this period.

Free cash flow has been declining. A deteriorating cash flow trend warrants extra scrutiny — the stock may be cheap for a reason.

Business Health

Annual financials — how the underlying business has performed over the past several years.

Cash Flow Free cash flow & net income ($M)

Revenue Annual revenue ($M) — business growth proxy

Total Debt Balance sheet debt ($M)

ROIC Return on invested capital (%)

FCF Yield Free cash flow / market cap (%) — Yartseva signal

Gross Margin Pricing power & competitive moat (%)

Shares Outstanding Buybacks vs dilution (millions)

Growth of $100: CNP vs S&P 500

Monthly data normalized to $100 at start. Vertical dashed lines mark 200-week MA touches.

What Happens After CNP Crosses Below the Line?

Across 10 historical episodes, buying CNP when it crossed below its 200-week moving average produced an average return of +22.9% after 12 months (median +19.0%), compared to +7.2% for the S&P 500 over the same periods. 60% of those episodes were profitable after one year. After 24 months, the average return was +28.3% vs +19.4% for the index.

Each line shows $100 invested at the moment CNP crossed below its 200-week MA. Bold blue = stock average. Gray dashed = S&P 500 average over same periods.

Bean Score Experimental

The Bean Score measures how far a stock's free cash flow yield has deviated from its own quarterly baseline, normalized by the stock's historical behavior. CNP currently has negative free cash flow, so price-based dislocation levels are not available. The score still tracks yield deviation from baseline.

Current Bean Score -0.81σ
Current FCF Yield -9.57%
Baseline Yield -9.40%
Historical σ 0.57pp

Quarterly FCF & Yield Trailing twelve-month free cash flow and yield at each quarter end

Data depth: 2 quarterly baselines, 22 price observations — Limited history (4+ quarters preferred for reliability)

Signal Accuracy Collecting Data

The Bean Score system is accumulating weekly data to validate signal accuracy. After 13+ weeks of history, this section will display win rates and average returns for each σ threshold crossing — answering the question: "When this score says cheap or expensive, does the price subsequently move in the expected direction?"

11 / 13 weeks minimum

Theoretical framework — not backtested or forward-tested. The Bean Score uses trailing twelve-month free cash flow yield as a dislocation identifier. It measures whether the market has pushed a stock's yield unusually far from its own baseline behavior. These levels are reference points for identifying potential swing trade opportunities, not buy/sell signals. FCF values update quarterly with earnings; between reports, all movement is price-driven.

Dislocation Scores Experimental

Each score measures deviation from CNP's own historical baseline — the same idea as the Bean Score, applied to different fundamentals. Positive means cheaper or more dislocated than this stock's norm. Scores marked σ are normalized by the stock's own variability; pp values are simple deltas from its recent baseline.

⚠ Earnings quality deteriorating — net income is outrunning free cash flow vs this company's own norm. Cheapness signals here deserve extra scrutiny.
Yield Dislocation -1.17σ Dividend yield vs own 10-yr norm
Drawdown Score -0.83σ Distance from line vs own history
Sector-Relative N/A Vs sector median this week
Buyback Acceleration -1.0pp YoY share change vs own 3-yr pace (− = accelerating)
Insider Intensity N/A TTM buys / market cap, percentile of buyers
FCF Yield vs History -7.9pp Vs own recent annual mean
Earnings Quality Deteriorating Accrual gap trend (+5.0pp of revenue)

Theoretical framework — not backtested. These scores describe how unusual today's readings are for this specific company. They are starting points for research, not buy or sell signals. Annual-statement scores (buyback, accruals, FCF vs history) rest on only ~4 yearly data points and are deltas, not sigmas.

Advertisement

Historical Touches

CNP has crossed below its 200-week MA 26 times with an average 1-year return of +6.3% after recovery.

Crossed BelowRecoveredWeeksMax Depth1-Year ReturnReturn Since Touch
Jun 1966Oct 19661712.8%+6.5%+12030.0%
Nov 1966Nov 196611.3%-11.3%+11476.4%
Mar 1967Mar 196710.7%-6.9%+11231.9%
May 1967Jan 19683618.8%-9.8%+11142.2%
Jan 1968Nov 19684212.1%+2.0%+11156.2%
Dec 1968Jan 196976.2%-7.8%+11212.0%
Feb 1969Oct 19693519.4%-8.3%+11300.7%
Nov 1969Feb 19701611.9%+1.8%+11808.1%
Apr 1970Jul 19701414.0%+21.2%+12106.0%
Aug 1970Aug 197021.2%+13.2%+12046.3%
Oct 1970Nov 197010.7%+18.4%+12031.1%
Apr 1973Apr 197310.7%-44.5%+10833.9%
Jun 1973Sep 19731410.8%-44.7%+10678.5%
Oct 1973Aug 197614852.5%-45.4%+10743.5%
Aug 1976Aug 197610.6%+33.7%+14529.8%
Nov 1980Nov 198012.2%+28.2%+10678.2%
Mar 1994Dec 19943816.9%+18.2%+1365.1%
Dec 1999Jan 200010.6%+99.0%+677.8%
Jan 2000Apr 20001211.3%+53.8%+671.5%
Sep 2001Jan 200517673.4%-61.3%+488.0%
Sep 2008Nov 20096034.3%-4.3%+522.9%
Jun 2010Jul 201010.7%+59.3%+485.0%
May 2015Mar 20164317.8%+13.8%+207.5%
Nov 2019Dec 201921.3%-1.5%+108.1%
Feb 2020Apr 20216050.3%-12.3%+101.5%
Aug 2024Aug 202412.4%+51.9%+74.4%
Average28+6.3%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is CNP below its 200-week moving average?

No. CenterPoint Energy Inc. (CNP) is currently 36.7% above its 200-week moving average of $31.33. It would need to fall to $31.33 to cross below the line.

What is CNP's 200-week moving average price?

CenterPoint Energy Inc.'s 200-week moving average is $31.33 as of 2026-06-19. This is the average weekly closing price over roughly the last 4 years, and it acts as a long-term trend line. When a stock drops below this level, it can signal that the price has fallen far enough from the long-term trend to attract value-oriented investors.

What happens when CNP drops below its 200-week moving average?

CNP has crossed below its 200-week moving average 26 times in our data. On average, buying at that moment produced a one-year return of +6.3%. These dips have historically been decent entry points. These episodes lasted 28 weeks on average.

Is CNP a good value right now?

Here's what our data says about CNP as of 2026-06-19: The stock is above its 200-week moving average, so it doesn't currently meet our primary signal. The 14-week RSI is 45. Free cash flow is currently negative. Return on equity is 9.6%. Price-to-book is 2.5x. This is not a buy or sell recommendation — always do your own research.

How does CNP compare to the S&P 500?

Over the past 33.5 years, $100 invested in CNP would have grown to $1230, compared to $3097 for the S&P 500. That's 7.8% annualized vs 10.8% for the index. CNP has underperformed the broader market over this period.

Not financial advice. This is an educational tool. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Do your own research before making investment decisions.

Data as of week of 2026-06-19