AMBA

Ambarella, Inc. Technology - Semiconductor Equipment & Materials Investor Relations →

NO
0.5% ABOVE
↓ Approaching Was 3.0% last week
-15% -10% -5% 0% 5% 10% 15%+
Signal Threshold $65.85
14-Week RSI 49
Rel. Volume (14w) This week's trading vs. the 14-week average 1.0x
Buyers vs. Sellers (14w) Are up-weeks or down-weeks getting more volume? 1.64 — Buyers winning

Ambarella, Inc. (AMBA) closed at $66.15 as of 2026-09-18, trading 0.5% above its 200-week moving average of $65.85. The stock is currently moving closer to the line, down from 3.0% last week. The 14-week RSI sits at 49, indicating neutral momentum.

Over the past 14 weeks, up-weeks have carried more volume than down-weeks (1.64 buyers-vs-sellers ratio). When trading picks up, it's more often on days the price is rising — buyers are showing more interest than sellers.

Over the past 679 weeks of data, AMBA has crossed below its 200-week moving average 15 times. On average, these episodes lasted 20 weeks. Historically, investors who bought AMBA at the start of these episodes saw an average one-year return of +32.5%.

With a market cap of $2.9 billion, AMBA is a mid-cap stock. The company generates a free cash flow yield of 1.1%. Return on equity stands at -9.4%. The stock trades at 4.7x book value.

Share count has increased 10.9% over three years, indicating dilution.

Over the past 13.1 years, a hypothetical investment of $100 in AMBA would have grown to $331, compared to $564 for the S&P 500. AMBA has returned 9.6% annualized vs 14.1% for the index, underperforming the broader market over this period.

Free cash flow has been growing at a 25.9% compound annual rate, with 4 consecutive years of positive cash generation.

Business Health

Annual financials — how the underlying business has performed over the past several years.

Cash Flow Free cash flow & net income ($M)

Revenue Annual revenue ($M) — business growth proxy

Total Debt Balance sheet debt ($M)

ROIC Return on invested capital (%)

FCF Yield Free cash flow / market cap (%) — Yartseva signal

Gross Margin Pricing power & competitive moat (%)

Shares Outstanding Buybacks vs dilution (millions)

Growth of $100: AMBA vs S&P 500

Monthly data normalized to $100 at start. Vertical dashed lines mark 200-week MA touches.

What Happens After AMBA Crosses Below the Line?

Across 14 historical episodes, buying AMBA when it crossed below its 200-week moving average produced an average return of +30.7% after 12 months (median +27.0%), compared to +22.8% for the S&P 500 over the same periods. 70% of those episodes were profitable after one year. After 24 months, the average return was +17.1% vs +41.9% for the index.

Each line shows $100 invested at the moment AMBA crossed below its 200-week MA. Bold blue = stock average. Gray dashed = S&P 500 average over same periods.

Bean Score Experimental

The Bean Score measures how far a stock's free cash flow yield has deviated from its own quarterly baseline, normalized by the stock's historical behavior. Between earnings dates, FCF is constant — so the score is purely a function of stock price. The levels below show at what prices AMBA would reach each dislocation threshold.

Current Bean Score +1.04σ
Current FCF Yield 0.33%
Baseline Yield 0.26%
Historical σ 0.06pp

Dislocation Price Levels

Prices where AMBA's Bean Score would hit each σ threshold. Valid until next earnings report: 2026-12-01.

LevelσPriceSignal
Deep Value+2σ$56.22Unusually cheap — analysis point
Value+1σ$66.61Cheap vs. own history
Fair Value+0σ$81.72Historical mean behavior
Expensive-1σ$105.67Expensive vs. own history
Deep Expensive-2σ$149.51Unusually expensive — analysis point

Quarterly FCF & Yield Trailing twelve-month free cash flow and yield at each quarter end

Recent Earnings

DateEPS Est.EPS ActualSurprise
2026-09-03$0.17$0.18+5.3%
2026-05-28$0.10$0.11+5.4%
2026-02-26$0.10$0.13+26.7%
2025-11-25$0.21$0.27+29.6%
Data depth: 2 quarterly baselines, 20 price observations — Limited history (4+ quarters preferred for reliability)

Signal Accuracy Collecting Data

The Bean Score system is accumulating weekly data to validate signal accuracy. After 13+ weeks of history, this section will display win rates and average returns for each σ threshold crossing — answering the question: "When this score says cheap or expensive, does the price subsequently move in the expected direction?"

13 / 13 weeks minimum

the write-ups I read Simply Wall St · Visual company reports and write-ups. Free tier covers five reports a month. referral

Theoretical framework — not backtested or forward-tested. The Bean Score uses trailing twelve-month free cash flow yield as a dislocation identifier. It measures whether the market has pushed a stock's yield unusually far from its own baseline behavior. These levels are analysis points: prices at which the yield deviation becomes unusual enough to justify the work. FCF values update quarterly with earnings; between reports, all movement is price-driven.

Dislocation Scores Experimental

Each score measures deviation from AMBA's own historical baseline — the same idea as the Bean Score, applied to different fundamentals. Positive means cheaper or more dislocated than this stock's norm. Scores marked σ are normalized by the stock's own variability; pp values are simple deltas from its recent baseline.

⚠ Earnings quality deteriorating — net income is outrunning free cash flow vs this company's own norm. Cheapness signals here deserve extra scrutiny.
Yield Dislocation N/A Dividend yield vs own 10-yr norm
Drawdown Score +0.40σ Distance from line vs own history
Sector-Relative +0.67σ Vs sector median this week
Buyback Acceleration -0.3pp YoY share change vs own 3-yr pace (− = accelerating)
Insider Intensity N/A TTM buys / market cap, percentile of buyers
FCF Yield vs History +0.2pp Vs own recent annual mean
Earnings Quality Deteriorating Accrual gap trend (+17.5pp of revenue)

Theoretical framework — not backtested. These scores describe how unusual today's readings are for this specific company. Each one is an analysis point, a reason to open the filings. Annual-statement scores (buyback, accruals, FCF vs history) rest on only ~4 yearly data points and are deltas, not sigmas.

Historical Touches

AMBA has crossed below its 200-week MA 15 times with an average 1-year return of +32.5% after recovery.

Crossed BelowRecoveredWeeksMax Depth1-Year ReturnReturn Since Touch
Jan 2016Feb 201645.3%+27.9%+73.1%
Mar 2016Mar 201610.9%+34.7%+68.8%
May 2016May 201638.3%+52.2%+72.9%
Jun 2017Oct 20171919.3%-10.6%+35.5%
Jan 2018Aug 20198442.2%-29.3%+28.7%
Mar 2020May 2020820.3%+151.8%+46.4%
Jun 2020Aug 20201010.8%+100.3%+35.3%
Jun 2022Jul 2022618.0%+27.2%-1.8%
Aug 2022Dec 20221738.1%+1.4%+5.2%
Feb 2023Aug 202513052.7%-30.8%-19.9%
Jan 2026Apr 20261223.2%N/A+3.3%
Jun 2026Jun 202612.9%N/A+4.1%
Jun 2026Jun 202614.5%N/A+6.5%
Jul 2026Jul 202615.1%N/A+7.0%
Aug 2026Sep 202614.5%N/A+5.2%
Average20+32.5%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is AMBA below its 200-week moving average?

No. Ambarella, Inc. (AMBA) is currently 0.5% above its 200-week moving average of $65.85. It would need to fall to $65.85 to cross below the line.

What is AMBA's 200-week moving average price?

Ambarella, Inc.'s 200-week moving average is $65.85 as of 2026-09-18. This is the average weekly closing price over roughly the last 4 years, and it acts as a long-term trend line. When a stock drops below this level, it can signal that the price has fallen far enough from the long-term trend to attract value-oriented investors.

What happens when AMBA drops below its 200-week moving average?

AMBA has crossed below its 200-week moving average 15 times in our data. On average, buying at that moment produced a one-year return of +32.5%. These dips have historically been decent entry points. These episodes lasted 20 weeks on average.

Is AMBA a good value right now?

Here's what our data says about AMBA as of 2026-09-18: The stock is above its 200-week moving average, so it doesn't currently meet our primary signal. The 14-week RSI is 49. Free cash flow yield is 1.1%. Return on equity is -9.4%. Price-to-book is 4.7x. This is not a buy or sell recommendation — always do your own research.

How does AMBA compare to the S&P 500?

Over the past 13.1 years, $100 invested in AMBA would have grown to $331, compared to $564 for the S&P 500. That's 9.6% annualized vs 14.1% for the index. AMBA has underperformed the broader market over this period.

Not financial advice. This is an educational tool. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Do your own research before making investment decisions.

Data as of week of 2026-09-18