NEM

Newmont Corporation Materials - Gold Mining Investor Relations →

NO
101.4% ABOVE
↓ Approaching Was 116.4% last week
-15% -10% -5% 0% 5% 10% 15%+
Buy Threshold $54.15
14-Week RSI 47
Rel. Volume (14w) This week's trading vs. the 14-week average 1.0x
Buyers vs. Sellers (14w) Are up-weeks or down-weeks getting more volume? 0.87

Newmont Corporation (NEM) closed at $109.06 as of 2026-05-15, trading 101.4% above its 200-week moving average of $54.15. The stock is currently moving closer to the line, down from 116.4% last week. The 14-week RSI sits at 47, indicating neutral momentum.

Trading volume is running at 1.0x of its 14-week average, which is in the normal range. The balance between buying and selling volume (0.87 ratio) is neutral — neither side is clearly dominating.

Over the past 2360 weeks of data, NEM has crossed below its 200-week moving average 44 times. On average, these episodes lasted 20 weeks. Historically, investors who bought NEM at the start of these episodes saw an average one-year return of +21.1%.

With a market cap of $116.4 billion, NEM is a large-cap stock. The company generates a free cash flow yield of 8.4%, which is notably high. Return on equity stands at 25.8%, indicating strong profitability. The stock trades at 3.4x book value.

Share count has increased 37.3% over three years, indicating dilution. NEM passes our Buffett quality screen: high return on equity, low debt, and positive free cash flow.

Over the past 33.4 years, a hypothetical investment of $100 in NEM would have grown to $585, compared to $3058 for the S&P 500. NEM has returned 5.4% annualized vs 10.8% for the index, underperforming the broader market over this period.

Free cash flow has been growing at a 88.5% compound annual rate, with 4 consecutive years of positive cash generation.

Business Health

Annual financials — how the underlying business has performed over the past several years.

Cash Flow Free cash flow & net income ($M)

Revenue Annual revenue ($M) — business growth proxy

Total Debt Balance sheet debt ($M)

ROIC Return on invested capital (%)

FCF Yield Free cash flow / market cap (%) — Yartseva signal

Gross Margin Pricing power & competitive moat (%)

Shares Outstanding Buybacks vs dilution (millions)

Growth of $100: NEM vs S&P 500

Monthly data normalized to $100 at start. Vertical dashed lines mark 200-week MA touches.

What Happens After NEM Crosses Below the Line?

Across 32 historical episodes, buying NEM when it crossed below its 200-week moving average produced an average return of +22.9% after 12 months (median +22.0%), compared to +12.4% for the S&P 500 over the same periods. 69% of those episodes were profitable after one year. After 24 months, the average return was +21.5% vs +27.6% for the index.

Each line shows $100 invested at the moment NEM crossed below its 200-week MA. Bold blue = stock average. Gray dashed = S&P 500 average over same periods.

Bean Score Experimental

The Bean Score measures how far a stock's free cash flow yield has deviated from its own quarterly baseline, normalized by the stock's historical behavior. Between earnings dates, FCF is constant — so the score is purely a function of stock price. The levels below show at what prices NEM would reach each dislocation threshold.

Current Bean Score +1.62σ
Current FCF Yield 7.93%
Baseline Yield 7.59%
Historical σ 0.55pp

Dislocation Price Levels

Prices where NEM's Bean Score would hit each σ threshold. Valid until next earnings report (last report: 2026-03-31).

LevelσPriceSignal
Deep Value+2σ$106.25Unusually cheap — potential buy zone
Value+1σ$113.95Cheap vs. own history
Fair Value+0σ$122.84Historical mean behavior
Expensive-1σ$133.24Expensive vs. own history
Deep Expensive-2σ$145.56Unusually expensive — potential trim zone
Data depth: 2 quarterly baselines, 19 price observations — Limited history (4+ quarters preferred for reliability)

Signal Accuracy Collecting Data

The Bean Score system is accumulating weekly data to validate signal accuracy. After 13+ weeks of history, this section will display win rates and average returns for each σ threshold crossing — answering the question: "When this score says cheap or expensive, does the price subsequently move in the expected direction?"

0 / 13 weeks minimum

Theoretical framework — not backtested or forward-tested. The Bean Score uses trailing twelve-month free cash flow yield as a dislocation identifier. It measures whether the market has pushed a stock's yield unusually far from its own baseline behavior. These levels are reference points for identifying potential swing trade opportunities, not buy/sell signals. FCF values update quarterly with earnings; between reports, all movement is price-driven.

Advertisement

Historical Touches

NEM has crossed below its 200-week MA 44 times with an average 1-year return of +21.1% after recovery.

Crossed BelowRecoveredWeeksMax Depth1-Year ReturnReturn Since Touch
Sep 1981Sep 198111.6%-23.3%+1319.4%
Oct 1981Nov 19825841.7%-6.5%+1489.1%
Sep 1983Oct 198311.1%-26.4%+1415.0%
Oct 1983Nov 198334.1%-24.7%+1455.3%
Jan 1984Feb 198475.8%-25.3%+1407.2%
Apr 1984Jul 19856534.0%-6.6%+1376.8%
Jul 1985Aug 198522.6%+6.9%+1580.5%
Sep 1985Sep 198525.7%+49.0%+1645.7%
Mar 1986Apr 198612.3%+107.4%+1533.5%
Apr 1986May 198648.1%+120.2%+1529.0%
Jun 1986Aug 198677.0%+98.5%+1484.8%
Oct 1990Jun 19913715.2%+8.5%+521.7%
Jul 1991Sep 199199.5%+33.2%+505.8%
Nov 1991Nov 199110.7%+18.9%+491.6%
Dec 1991Dec 199110.5%+5.0%+485.5%
Mar 1992May 199274.8%+16.3%+487.4%
Nov 1992Mar 1993187.8%+44.9%+474.0%
Dec 1994Jan 199555.6%+27.9%+389.4%
Jan 1995Mar 199565.6%+68.4%+412.9%
Oct 1995Oct 199511.0%+26.1%+357.6%
Jan 1997Feb 199768.5%-37.6%+314.9%
Mar 1997Sep 19972821.1%-34.5%+294.4%
Oct 1997Aug 200120063.8%-43.6%+300.7%
Aug 2001Sep 200121.8%+38.1%+695.2%
Nov 2001Jan 2002107.8%+27.8%+731.8%
Oct 2006Oct 200610.6%+10.7%+283.7%
Feb 2007Apr 200764.1%+19.8%+268.8%
Apr 2007Sep 20072011.5%+6.1%+272.9%
Apr 2008May 200821.7%-6.7%+251.6%
Aug 2008May 20094147.2%-3.7%+260.0%
Jun 2009Aug 20091315.4%+20.8%+247.2%
Sep 2009Oct 200925.6%+49.2%+261.9%
Oct 2009Nov 200912.4%+41.2%+256.7%
Jan 2010Feb 201013.0%+29.4%+261.0%
Apr 2012May 201289.0%-14.8%+214.1%
Jun 2012Aug 20121010.7%-35.1%+210.4%
Oct 2012Apr 201617953.4%-44.7%+203.3%
Sep 2018Oct 201851.3%+33.8%+353.9%
Oct 2018Oct 201812.6%+36.0%+353.7%
Apr 2019May 201933.4%+104.7%+335.9%
Jul 2022Jan 20232318.9%-2.1%+168.4%
Jan 2023Aug 20248038.1%-28.2%+137.7%
Oct 2024Mar 20251919.8%+82.5%+147.0%
Mar 2025Apr 202513.9%+161.5%+150.1%
Average20+21.1%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is NEM below its 200-week moving average?

No. Newmont Corporation (NEM) is currently 101.4% above its 200-week moving average of $54.15. It would need to fall to $54.15 to cross below the line.

What is NEM's 200-week moving average price?

Newmont Corporation's 200-week moving average is $54.15 as of 2026-05-15. This is the average weekly closing price over roughly the last 4 years, and it acts as a long-term trend line. When a stock drops below this level, it can signal that the price has fallen far enough from the long-term trend to attract value-oriented investors.

What happens when NEM drops below its 200-week moving average?

NEM has crossed below its 200-week moving average 44 times in our data. On average, buying at that moment produced a one-year return of +21.1%. These dips have historically been decent entry points. These episodes lasted 20 weeks on average.

Is NEM a good value right now?

Here's what our data says about NEM as of 2026-05-15: The stock is above its 200-week moving average, so it doesn't currently meet our primary signal. The 14-week RSI is 47. Free cash flow yield is 8.4%. Return on equity is 25.8%. Price-to-book is 3.4x. This is not a buy or sell recommendation — always do your own research.

How does NEM compare to the S&P 500?

Over the past 33.4 years, $100 invested in NEM would have grown to $585, compared to $3058 for the S&P 500. That's 5.4% annualized vs 10.8% for the index. NEM has underperformed the broader market over this period.

Does NEM pay a dividend?

Yes. Newmont Corporation currently pays a dividend yield of 95.00%.

Not financial advice. This is an educational tool. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Do your own research before making investment decisions.

Data as of week of 2026-05-15