MT

ArcelorMittal S.A. Basic Materials - Steel Investor Relations →

NO
121.0% ABOVE
↓ Approaching Was 135.2% last week
-15% -10% -5% 0% 5% 10% 15%+
Signal Threshold $33.72
14-Week RSI 59
Rel. Volume (14w) This week's trading vs. the 14-week average 0.6x
Buyers vs. Sellers (14w) Are up-weeks or down-weeks getting more volume? 1.11

ArcelorMittal S.A. (MT) closed at $74.51 as of 2026-09-11, trading 121.0% above its 200-week moving average of $33.72. The stock is currently moving closer to the line, down from 135.2% last week. The 14-week RSI sits at 59, indicating neutral momentum.

Trading volume is running at 0.6x of its 14-week average, which is in the normal range. The balance between buying and selling volume (1.11 ratio) is neutral — neither side is clearly dominating.

Over the past 1470 weeks of data, MT has crossed below its 200-week moving average 13 times. On average, these episodes lasted 66 weeks. Historically, investors who bought MT at the start of these episodes saw an average one-year return of +5.3%.

With a market cap of $56.1 billion, MT is a large-cap stock. Free cash flow yield is currently negative, meaning the company is burning cash. Return on equity stands at 3.3%. The stock trades at 2.0x book value.

The company has been aggressively buying back shares, reducing its share count by 5.5% over the past three years.

Over the past 28.2 years, a hypothetical investment of $100 in MT would have grown to $336, compared to $1110 for the S&P 500. MT has returned 4.4% annualized vs 8.9% for the index, underperforming the broader market over this period.

Free cash flow has been declining at a -58.8% compound annual rate. A deteriorating cash flow trend warrants extra scrutiny — the stock may be cheap for a reason.

Business Health

Annual financials — how the underlying business has performed over the past several years.

Cash Flow Free cash flow & net income ($M)

Revenue Annual revenue ($M) — business growth proxy

Total Debt Balance sheet debt ($M)

ROIC Return on invested capital (%)

FCF Yield Free cash flow / market cap (%) — Yartseva signal

Gross Margin Pricing power & competitive moat (%)

Shares Outstanding Buybacks vs dilution (millions)

Growth of $100: MT vs S&P 500

Monthly data normalized to $100 at start. Vertical dashed lines mark 200-week MA touches.

What Happens After MT Crosses Below the Line?

Across 13 historical episodes, buying MT when it crossed below its 200-week moving average produced an average return of +5.8% after 12 months (median +8.0%), compared to +13.3% for the S&P 500 over the same periods. 54% of those episodes were profitable after one year. After 24 months, the average return was +23.7% vs +34.2% for the index.

Each line shows $100 invested at the moment MT crossed below its 200-week MA. Bold blue = stock average. Gray dashed = S&P 500 average over same periods.

Bean Score Experimental

The Bean Score measures how far a stock's free cash flow yield has deviated from its own quarterly baseline, normalized by the stock's historical behavior. MT currently has negative free cash flow, so price-based dislocation levels are not available. The score still tracks yield deviation from baseline.

Current Bean Score +1.14σ
Current FCF Yield -0.28%
Baseline Yield -0.33%
Historical σ 0.13pp

Quarterly FCF & Yield Trailing twelve-month free cash flow and yield at each quarter end

Recent Earnings

DateEPS Est.EPS ActualSurprise
2026-07-30$1.09$0.89-18.4%
2026-04-30$0.71$0.75+6.1%
2026-02-05$0.55$0.86+56.9%
2025-11-06$0.55$0.62+12.1%
Data depth: 2 quarterly baselines, 23 price observations — Limited history (4+ quarters preferred for reliability)

Signal Accuracy Collecting Data

The Bean Score system is accumulating weekly data to validate signal accuracy. After 13+ weeks of history, this section will display win rates and average returns for each σ threshold crossing — answering the question: "When this score says cheap or expensive, does the price subsequently move in the expected direction?"

12 / 13 weeks minimum

the write-ups I read Simply Wall St · Visual company reports and write-ups. Free tier covers five reports a month. referral

Theoretical framework — not backtested or forward-tested. The Bean Score uses trailing twelve-month free cash flow yield as a dislocation identifier. It measures whether the market has pushed a stock's yield unusually far from its own baseline behavior. These levels are analysis points: prices at which the yield deviation becomes unusual enough to justify the work. FCF values update quarterly with earnings; between reports, all movement is price-driven.

Dislocation Scores Experimental

Each score measures deviation from MT's own historical baseline — the same idea as the Bean Score, applied to different fundamentals. Positive means cheaper or more dislocated than this stock's norm. Scores marked σ are normalized by the stock's own variability; pp values are simple deltas from its recent baseline.

⚠ Earnings quality deteriorating — net income is outrunning free cash flow vs this company's own norm. Cheapness signals here deserve extra scrutiny.
Yield Dislocation -0.69σ Dividend yield vs own 10-yr norm
Drawdown Score -1.24σ Distance from line vs own history
Sector-Relative N/A Vs sector median this week
Buyback Acceleration +0.9pp YoY share change vs own 3-yr pace (− = accelerating)
Insider Intensity N/A TTM buys / market cap, percentile of buyers
FCF Yield vs History -13.1pp Vs own recent annual mean
Earnings Quality Deteriorating Accrual gap trend (+3.9pp of revenue)

Theoretical framework — not backtested. These scores describe how unusual today's readings are for this specific company. Each one is an analysis point, a reason to open the filings. Annual-statement scores (buyback, accruals, FCF vs history) rest on only ~4 yearly data points and are deltas, not sigmas.

Historical Touches

MT has crossed below its 200-week MA 13 times with an average 1-year return of +5.3% after recovery.

Crossed BelowRecoveredWeeksMax Depth1-Year ReturnReturn Since Touch
Jul 1998Dec 19997675.6%-30.3%+171.5%
Jan 2000Sep 200318991.9%-77.2%+235.3%
Sep 2008Jan 201743374.5%-19.6%+2.9%
Jan 2017Feb 201712.0%+44.2%+246.0%
Apr 2017Jul 20171315.8%+48.2%+272.8%
Nov 2018Jan 201999.9%-23.7%+259.7%
Feb 2019Feb 201913.6%-18.3%+273.0%
Mar 2019Dec 20209366.3%-37.5%+292.1%
Sep 2022Oct 202247.5%+22.5%+289.3%
Oct 2023Nov 202359.2%+11.3%+244.6%
Apr 2024May 202440.7%+9.4%+206.0%
Jun 2024Feb 20253519.5%+22.1%+206.4%
Mar 2025Apr 202516.4%+117.8%+208.0%
Average66+5.3%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is MT below its 200-week moving average?

No. ArcelorMittal S.A. (MT) is currently 121.0% above its 200-week moving average of $33.72. It would need to fall to $33.72 to cross below the line.

What is MT's 200-week moving average price?

ArcelorMittal S.A.'s 200-week moving average is $33.72 as of 2026-09-11. This is the average weekly closing price over roughly the last 4 years, and it acts as a long-term trend line. When a stock drops below this level, it can signal that the price has fallen far enough from the long-term trend to attract value-oriented investors.

What happens when MT drops below its 200-week moving average?

MT has crossed below its 200-week moving average 13 times in our data. On average, buying at that moment produced a one-year return of +5.3%. These dips have historically been decent entry points. These episodes lasted 66 weeks on average.

Is MT a good value right now?

Here's what our data says about MT as of 2026-09-11: The stock is above its 200-week moving average, so it doesn't currently meet our primary signal. The 14-week RSI is 59. Free cash flow is currently negative. Return on equity is 3.3%. Price-to-book is 2.0x. This is not a buy or sell recommendation — always do your own research.

How does MT compare to the S&P 500?

Over the past 28.2 years, $100 invested in MT would have grown to $336, compared to $1110 for the S&P 500. That's 4.4% annualized vs 8.9% for the index. MT has underperformed the broader market over this period.

Does MT pay a dividend?

Yes. ArcelorMittal S.A. currently pays a dividend yield of 80.00%.

Not financial advice. This is an educational tool. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Do your own research before making investment decisions.

Data as of week of 2026-09-11